
|
Congress
Films
What
the #$*! Do we know?!
"WHAT THE #$*! DO WE KNOW?!" is a new type of film.
It is part documentary, part story, and part elaborate and inspiring
visual effects and animations. The protagonist, Amanda, played by
Marlee Matlin, finds herself in a fantastic Alice in Wonderland
experience when her daily, uninspired life literally begins to unravel,
revealing the uncertain world of the quantum field hidden behind
what we consider to be our normal, waking reality.
She is literally plunged into a swirl of chaotic occurrences,
while the characters she encounters on this odyssey reveal the deeper,
hidden knowledge she doesn't even realize she has asked for. Like
every hero, Amanda is thrown into crisis, questioning the fundamental
premises of her life – that the reality she has believed in
about how men are, how relationships with others should be, and
how her emotions are affecting her work isn't reality at all!
As Amanda learns to relax into the experience, she conquers her
fears, gains wisdom, and wins the keys to the great secrets of the
ages, all in the most entertaining way. She is then no longer the
victim of circumstances, but she is on the way to being the creative
force in her life. Her life will never be the same.
The fourteen top scientists and mystics interviewed in documentary
style serve as a modern day Greek Chorus. In an artful filmic dance,
their ideas are woven together as a tapestry of truth. The thoughts
and words of one member of the chorus blend into those of the next,
adding further emphasis to the film's underlying concept of
the interconnectedness of all things.
The chorus members act as hosts who live outside of the story,
and from this Olympian view, comment on the actions of the characters
below. They are also there to introduce the Great Questions framed
by both science and religion, which divides the film into a series
of acts. Through the course of the film, the distinction between
science and religion becomes increasingly blurred, since we realize
that, in essence, both science and religion describe the same phenomena.
The film employs animation to realize the radical knowledge that
modern science has unearthed in recent years. Powerful cinematic
sequences explore the inner-workings of the human brain. Quirky
animation introduces us to the smallest form of consciousness in
the body – the cell. Dazzling visuals reinforce the film's
message in an exciting, powerful way. Done with humor, precision,
and irreverence, these scenes are only part of what makes this film
unique in the history of cinema, and a true box-office winner.
Baraka
This is what Roger Ebert has to say about Baraka:
In this world of wonders there are still places that have not
been smoothed over with the shallow surfaces of Western commercialism.
The amazing thing is not how widely the McCulture has spread, but
how many corners it has missed. It is claimed that the great age
of travel is dead - that there are no longer amazing, exotic, beautiful
and fearsome places for the traveler to discover. A movie like "Baraka"
gives hope.
On one level, the film is a 96-minute travelog. On another level,
it is a meditation on the planet. The director, Ron Fricke, has
taken his 70-mm camera all over the globe to photograph natural
and human sights. Some of them are as ordinary as the traffic in
Manhattan. Some are as awesome as a solar eclipse. Some are as desperate
as the tribes of scavengers scuttling like crabs over the garbage
dumps of Calcutta.
Frick was cinematographer and collaborator on "Koyannisquatsi,"
the 1983 film by Geoffrey Reggio which is a direct ancestor of "Baraka."
In that film, Reggio used time-lapse photography to capture clouds
racing across the desert, and crowds of people dashing madly about
the caverns of big cities. Frick uses the same technique; it's like
watching the weather on fast-forward.
Time-lapse photography can be dismissed as a gimmick, but for me
it's something more than that. It's a visual demonstration of how
fleeting life is. Of how the decisions that seem momentous on our
time scale are flickering instants in the life of the planet, too
small to be observed except on the minute scale of human life. Somehow
the technique makes the earth and its inhabitants seem touchingly
fragile.
Against this fragility, man has raised the bulwark of religion,
and Frick's cameras show us man in the act of worship, from the
Pope in St. Paul's to rabbis at the Wailing Wall, from monks in
ancient temples to an extraordinary tribe of chanters who lean this
way and that in time to their prayer, waving their arms like trees
tossed in a storm, led by a man who seems immensely pleased to be
in the center of such ecstasy.
The music has been written by Michael Stearns, who plunders the
riches of ethnic music and chants and combines those sounds with
more Western ideas, so that the score becomes an anthology of the
sounds man makes to keep away the dark and make the light s ensible.
To listen to the sound track by itself, after seeing the movie,
would be to evoke the souls of all of these strange places.
Of course there is a "message" somewhere in "Baraka"
- the same message we have heard before, about how man must love
and respect the planet. This is a piety to which we all subscribe,
so long as it does not mean any inconvenience to us personally.
Few people wearing pro-ecology T-shirts, I imagine, ever think of
becoming vegetarian so that grains can be used to feed all the mouths
on the planet, instead of being converted into meat to feed a few.
And few people seeing "Baraka" will make any major changes
in their lives to respect the planet the movie celebrates. (I include
myself among that number.) So the movie has the power of a dream,
from which we awaken, instead of a warning, to which we respond.
|